VoIP Does Good
ShoreCap Exchange, a non-profit whose board I’m on, provides and helps fund technical assistance to microcredit institutions in developing countries. At a recent meeting we heard the story of a successful engagement which was Skype-enabled.
The bank receiving assistance is in a remote Asian country. The particular assignment was beefing up the HR function. The consultant we engaged realized that she couldn’t be successful without the full backing of the CEO. CEOs often (I was one) tend to regard HR as a necessary evil: it certainly isn’t a profit center and it often seems a focus for disagreeable issues.
But, the consultant pointed out in her presentation to us and her presentations to the client, that many problems in line departments are at least partially HR problems. Fraud for example, always a worry for any bank and a particularly acute problem in developing countries, can’t be addressed by procedures alone. A culture which doesn’t tolerate fraud needs to be constructed; hiring needs to support the antifraud effort; so does firing.
She had the ear of the CEO; she is an experienced executive coach; but she also had a problem. The implementation plan for strengthened HR serving a strengthening bank would take place over a period of almost a year. She couldn’t afford to stay there for the entire year and we couldn’t afford to keep her there that long nor fly her back and forth. Yet the difficult implementation would take much monitoring, coaching, encouraging, and problem solving.
According to the consultant, Skype was the answer. Lengthy traditional calls to this country would have been almost as expensive as travel to and fro. But Skype to Skype is free and Skype to landlines – especially when they called her in the US – is very cheap. She made a number of physical trips, of course; but she was also a virtual presence in a way that wouldn’t have been possible without VoIP.
In fact Skype seems to have become the preferred means of communication between ShoreCap Exchange, its consultants, and its clients. I smiled each time I heard the verb “Skype” replace the verb “phone”.
The high cost of communication to and from developing countries has been one of the barriers to these countries developing faster. Often misguided government policies have kept the price of traditional calls high to protect government and/or phone company revenues even at a price to the overall economy. VoIP has made clear what the true cost of connecting people is absent monopoly tolls. Whether you think of VoIP as arbitrage against artificially high international phone rates or a nifty technology for reducing the actual cost of calls (BTW, it’s both), VoIP is breaking down barriers to economic development. Makes me proud to have been part of the industry.





That’s a nice article. I found you via the placing you received in the The VoIP-News Top 25 VoIP Blogs of 2007. I am fairly new to VOIP but personally I have always found Interoute a joy to work with. They currently supply our secure business voip network.
http://www.interoute.com/product_groups/voice/isip/why_choose_isip"
Posted by: Tony Heywood | May 15, 2008 at 10:55 AM
What about FREE Long Distance -- WORLD-WIDE
AdCalls currently is offering FREE PC2PC Calling world-wide
and will soon offer FREE PC2Phone and Phone2Phone Long Distance (World-Wide)
This is great for Non-Profit Agencies and the best CRM model for any business.
www.adcalls.com
Posted by: Al Krauza | May 17, 2007 at 07:38 PM
I do not know which country this is. But India was in this category in the sense the international calls were expensive. But the current regulation allows the use of VoIP when making calls to foreign PSTNs and consequently, the rates to call other countries are very reasonable. But the regulation for terminating VoIP calls into Indian PSTN is still regulated. Accordingly, India is not one the canonical 40 countries that many of the VoIP service providers identify.
Posted by: Aswath | May 17, 2007 at 06:02 PM
I can't wait for the day that the barriers of access charges are broken down.
Posted by: Bill | May 17, 2007 at 02:36 PM